<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Docs &amp; Spreadsheets as a blogging tool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justplain.org/2006/10/11/263/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justplain.org/2006/10/11/263/</link>
	<description>Just another plain weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Outlet Moncler</title>
		<link>http://www.justplain.org/2006/10/11/263/comment-page-1/#comment-147140</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlet Moncler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justplain.org/2006/10/11/263/#comment-147140</guid>
		<description>In the great design of things you actually secure  an A+ for effort. Where exactly you confused me personally was on your particulars. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be more correct in this article. Having said that, allow me reveal to you what did do the job. Your article (parts of it) is definitely quite engaging which is most likely why I am making the effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, while I can easily notice the leaps in reason you make, I am not necessarily sure of just how you appear to unite the ideas which in turn produce the actual final result. For now I will yield to your position but hope in the foreseeable future you actually connect the facts better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the great design of things you actually secure  an A+ for effort. Where exactly you confused me personally was on your particulars. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be more correct in this article. Having said that, allow me reveal to you what did do the job. Your article (parts of it) is definitely quite engaging which is most likely why I am making the effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, while I can easily notice the leaps in reason you make, I am not necessarily sure of just how you appear to unite the ideas which in turn produce the actual final result. For now I will yield to your position but hope in the foreseeable future you actually connect the facts better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel mamann puerto vallarta</title>
		<link>http://www.justplain.org/2006/10/11/263/comment-page-1/#comment-134494</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel mamann puerto vallarta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justplain.org/2006/10/11/263/#comment-134494</guid>
		<description>Do you have a spam problem on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; we have developed some nice methods and we are looking to swap strategies with others, be sure to shoot me an e-mail if interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a spam problem on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; we have developed some nice methods and we are looking to swap strategies with others, be sure to shoot me an e-mail if interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

